Who Has Authority?
Map a question to Congress, the executive branch, an agency, a court, a state, a locality, or another institution.
Understand Government · Civic Clarity
Use primary records, identify the institution with authority, separate a report from a verified finding, and keep uncertainty visible. These guides apply the same evidence rules to every party, administration, agency, and claim.
These are durable explainers and official-source directories, not a live intelligence feed, a personalized legal service, or a claim that any requested record exists.
Choose among proactive disclosures, a Freedom of Information Act request, Mandatory Declassification Review, and an appeal without confusing one process for another.
Factual ExplainerFind the office with jurisdiction, distinguish an allegation from an official finding, and use lawful channels for sensitive or classified disclosures.
Factual ExplainerRead court filings, statutory reports, oversight reviews, and declassified procedures together before drawing a conclusion about an authority or program.
Factual ExplainerSee the source hierarchy, claim labels, publication gates, conflict rules, and correction process used across Civic Clarity.
Factual ExplainerReview how the former secrecy-and-UAP policy bucket was retired while legitimate records, oversight, and civil-liberties questions were preserved.
Name the agency, decision, record, authority, date range, and action you are trying to understand.
Prefer enacted law, court filings, agency records, audits, official statistics, and primary documents over commentary about them.
A filing is not a judgment, an allegation is not a finding, a missing record is not proof of concealment, and an unexplained event is not proof of a proposed cause.
Use the relevant request, appeal, oversight, court, legislative, or public-participation channel rather than sending the question to an office that cannot act.
Map a question to Congress, the executive branch, an agency, a court, a state, a locality, or another institution.
Follow statutory watchdog offices, leadership status, oversight events, and their source trail.
Understand award records, recipients, agencies, competition status, time periods, and modifications.
Keep legally distinct spending and influence categories separate before attributing money or control.
Review the source-to-claim verification pipeline shared by the unified public platform.
Inspect source records behind published claims across the platform.
Civic Clarity is not the advocacy voice of The American Renewal Plan. Sharing one public platform does not convert a factual explainer into a policy endorsement. Any Renewal Plan proposal discussed here must be independently sourced and presented alongside current law, authority, evidence, limitations, and serious competing arguments.
Read the governing relationship record and the Civic Clarity methodology.